The Problem

The data you're not looking at.

Your analysts check 1-2 sources per section and stop. The evidence for approval often exists — in the sources they never opened.

How Decisions Actually Get Made

Analysts find enough to decide, then move on.

Every verification has dozens of possible data points. But analysts don't check them all — they check what's easiest and most familiar, and stop as soon as they have enough to make a call. This isn't laziness. It's rational behavior under time pressure.

"They gravitate towards what the hell is the easiest and most comfortable and simple stuff to do and they've seen it before and oh, it looks good, great, go."

Bill Phelan

One analyst's real workload for a single application review:

6
Page template
per application
7+
Check types
per entity
4-5
Entities
client, applicant, vendor, guarantors
30+
Verifications
per application

She checks 1-2 sources per verification. The full decision space is hundreds of possible data points. The gap between what she checks and what exists is where approvals get lost.

"Another application comes into my desk. I gotta get that one checked. That means I gotta go to Google. I gotta go here. I gotta go there... I'm just going to use active. I'm making a decision based on active. It's good. Check that box. Put it in the file."

Bill Phelan
The Coverage Gap

What gets checked vs. what exists.

Rocky's Marine, Inc. — Petersburg, Alaska. Each verification category is a branch. The analyst checks one layer deep and stops. T2C's agent keeps going.

State Registration 1 source
OpenCorporates "Good Standing"
… stops here
Sec. of State AK direct Active, filing history current, annual reports up to date
Sec. of State WA Also registered in Washington — multi-state operations
D&B entity match Confirmed
Address 1 source
Google Maps "Confirmed on google maps"
… stops here
USPS validation Deliverable, commercial address
Sec. of State filing Address matches application
Yelp listing Same address confirmed
Reviews / Reputation 2 sources
Google Reviews 4.8 stars, 12 reviews
Yelp Listed, few reviews
… stops here
BBB No listing found
Facebook page reviews 4.9 stars, 28 reviews
Marine industry directory 47 five-star reviews — analyst didn't know this source existed
Social Media 1 source
Facebook Active page
… stops here
Instagram Active, 340 followers
LinkedIn Company page, 3 employees listed
Lawsuits / Claims 1 source
Copilot "No results"
… stops here
Federal court records No filings
Alaska state court No filings
BBB complaints None
UCC liens No adverse liens
Revenue 1 source
Unknown source "~$60k" estimate
… stops here
D&B revenue estimate $50k-$100k range
UCC filings Active equipment financing — confirms real, ongoing revenue
Google business data "Usually busy" on weekdays
7 sources checked across 6 categories

"Like to check and see if a business is active. It ain't easy to do. It's like literally four or five checks you have to run because it's so screwed up at the Secretary of State level. We've got all those four checks done for you here. They're done. Actually, it's five. Boom."

Bill Phelan
The Business Impact

Missed approvals. Weaker files.

Cost 1

Lost approvals.

The analyst checks the obvious sources, doesn't find what they need, rejects or flags. But the evidence for approval existed — in a source they didn't check. Every unnecessary rejection is revenue walked away from.

Rejected
Rocky's Marine, Inc.
Petersburg, Alaska
Evidence that existed
Alt. state filing — registered in WA, analyst only checked AK
UCC filings — active equipment financing confirms revenue
Industry reviews — 47 reviews on marine directory

"They could say it could be a negative for good standing, but they could actually be an active business. And we've done that work for them. So again, more approvals, more business."

Bill Phelan
Cost 2

Approvals you can't defend.

When the analyst does approve, they checked 2-3 sources. The file shows 2-3 sources. If that approval goes sideways, the audit trail is thin. Every unchecked source is a question an auditor could ask that you don't have an answer for.

Analyst file
3
sources checked, 3 citations
Agent file
18
sources checked, 18 citations

Same decision. Different defensibility.

"Based on your existing rules, you would have denied this. We found this confounding variable where you can accept and be safe."

Kyle Williams
The Agent Doesn't Satisfice

Every data point. Every source. Every time.

+

More approvals.

T2C's agent searches the full decision space — every data point, every source, every query variation. It finds the evidence that supports the application in sources the analyst never checked. Businesses that would have been rejected get approved.

More defensible approvals.

Every finding links back to its source. The agent doesn't just say "active" — it shows the five Secretary of State checks it ran. The approval file isn't 3 citations deep, it's 18. Every data point comes with a citation ready to paste.

"You can even take the rejects, the ones that you rejected, and have it think harder. Like go do it again, guys. I don't want to say no to all these prospects. And then think harder and then do it again, approve it. Boom, you get more approvals because everybody wants approvals."

Bill Phelan

"If there was something there that you could just click on it and it would kind of just take you to the source. I think that would be probably like helpful for us."

PB Analyst
Hypothetical
~18%
Avg. coverage per decision
~23%
Estimated opportunity gap
Illustrative estimate. Based on reverse-engineering what analysts actually check vs. the full decision space available. The real number depends on the customer's workflow, volume, and data sources.

"Could we reverse engineer all their past applications? And then say this is what it seems like you're actually making decisions on and we suspect there's a 23% hole in your opportunities because of the way that you're making these decisions."

Kyle Williams

We're going to give you the reasons to say yes.

The agent finds the evidence that supports the application — evidence your analysts would have missed or given up on. More approvals that are more defensible. Every data point accounted for, every source cited.

"Spot the risk but everything else green light go."

Andrew